The rate of increase in violent crime across Western society appears to be keeping pace with the frantic attempts of governments to strip the People their Common Law right to self-defense.

Relentless ethnic cleansing by governments and corporations across the Western world through mass, uncontrolled immigration under the guise of ‘diversity is our strength’, and ‘migrants are needed to do the work locals will not do’, has resulted in what appears to be an intended consequence of chaos and mass anxiety through crime and the incessant humiliation of the judiciary going soft on violent criminals, many of which have never been well received by the majority of citizens.

Exacerbating the situation is the apparent impotence of law enforcement, the judiciary and lawmakers to do their jobs in accordance with the law, their oaths of office, standards of ethical and professional conduct and may very well be in breach of the requirement of ‘duty of care’. Any one of these failings is sufficient to prove breaches of public office.

Natural Law, from with the Common Law is derived, demands that men are to ‘do no harm’. By subverting the Natural Law with statutory rules that attempt to remove the right of self-defense, lawmakers are committing trespass.

The failings of public officials to perform the duties of their office in a fair, just, and equitable manner necessitates scenarios where the People are in a position to act defensively in the protection of life and property, but to criminalize such behavior is a multiplier of their failings to perform the functions of their office in a way that is not a trespass to the inalienable rights of men and women.

The success of the occupiers of Western governments to strip the people of their right to self-defense has been made possible by the fact the vast majority of the People slumber on their rights. The old adage of government by consent is in many senses correct, as although it is perverse of governments to trick by coercion, and relentless media propaganda, the People into believing the rights they possess are determined by government fiat alone, the fact they have chosen to allow media to do the thinking for them, failure to demand true, inalienable rights

Methods of Remedy and Accountability

Public officials are bound by rules on many levels, despite the apparent criminality of their actions in trespassing the rights of the People to self-defense. Remedies men and women have applied include the following.

• Conditional Acceptance: Notice of Conditional Acceptance has been used to commence dialogue with key public officials involved in the formation and enforcement of rules (through statutes) that have the effect of trespassing the inalienable rights of men and women to self defense.
• Notice of Liability: Notices of liability support contingencies contained in the Notice of Conditional Acceptance. By continuing the dialogue with key public officers, that they are personally liable for harm to the People resulting from their decisions in public office, they thenceforth agree to personal liability, which may lead on to additional damages.
• Complaints and Official Sanctions: As public officials are bound by rules, standards and codes of conduct, they may be held accountable when in breach. Watchdog originations are ostensibly established to hear and review such complaints, however the experience of men and women in seeking remedy of wrongs in the past, that most watchdogs are simply sham bodies with no accountability. Secondary and tertiary options to compel watchdogs and investigators to be accountable and to perform their jobs in accordance with the law have also been considered as part of an overall strategy to achieve remedy.